‘These 4 runs…’: Bangladesh’s Towhid Hridoy criticizes umpiring requirements in controversial loss to South Africa | Cricket Information
[ad_1]
Hridoy highlighted a controversial name within the seventeenth over of Bangladesh’s run chase, the place a ball from Ottneil Baartman struck Mahmudullah‘s pad and went for 4.Initially given out LBW by the on-field umpire, the choice was overturned on overview. Nonetheless, because the umpire had declared it out, the ball was thought of useless, denying Bangladesh essential runs that might have altered the match final result.
Chatting with reporters after the sport, Hridoy lamented the impression of the choice, stating, “To be sincere, that was not a great name for us in such a decent match. In my standpoint, the umpire gave that out however it was fairly exhausting on us. These 4 runs might have modified the match state of affairs.”
Acknowledging the fallibility of umpires, Hridoy emphasised the importance of small margins in low-scoring matches and known as for enhancements in umpiring requirements, particularly in essential moments.
The 23-year-old additionally addressed his personal dismissal, the place he was given out LBW on a supply from Kagiso Rabada, regardless of replays suggesting the ball was solely clipping the leg stump. Reflecting on the shut calls, Hridoy burdened the significance of skilled batters ending matches in such tense conditions.
“In this sort of venue the place low-scoring matches are happening, one or two runs are an enormous factor. I feel these 4 runs or two wides are shut calls and I used to be given out on umpire’s name, and there’s room for enchancment,” he remarked.
(With inputs from IANS)
Post Comment